Champion sheet · Mid

Anivia

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · All regions

Tournament presence · pick + ban

10.7%#76 of 173 champions

Pick: 3.9%picked in 1,053 of 27,182 games
Ban: 6.8%1,523 bans over 22,310 games, against 3.1% in soloQ

Win rate as Mid49.7% between 46.9% and 52.4% over 868 gamesSoloQ 50.4%: no clear gap

Median length29.5 minsoloQ 27.4 min

Amateur: 27,223 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 66% · EUW 24% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 856,529 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.DraftLength
How to play itElectrocute, then Rod of Ages, Malignance, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compCrowd control (CC) first: more CC than 97% of mid laners.Lets allies carryCC
With / againstBetter than expected against Sivir in amateur play: +22.0 pts over 36 games, range above zero.+22.0 pt36 games
In draftFallback pick: comes out late in the series, once the pool has emptied.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

DraftPicked more often in amateur play
Amateur
1.6%
SoloQ
1.3%
1.6% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.3% in soloQ.
DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
6.8%
SoloQ
3.1%
6.8% ban rate in amateur play over 13,367 games, against 3.1% in soloQ over 323,918 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
29.5 min
SoloQ
27.4 min
Median of 29.5 min in amateur play, against 27.4 min in soloQ.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Electrocute, then Rod of Ages, Malignance, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesElectrocute69% · 17,593

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Teleport67% · 17,090

Same in amateur play

SkillsEnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 98% · 96 games

Core (3 legendaries)24% · 2,372

24%of soloQ games

Rod of Ages
Malignance
Zhonya's Hourglass

Amateur: Rod of Ages, Malignance, Liandry's Torment (17%), gap not settled

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 97% of mid laners.

Crowd control (CC)top3%1.6 · mid laners: 0.7
Lets allies carry killstop12%rank 88 of 100

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

Lets allies carry
CC

Like other mid laners

Damage in late game
Gold at 15 min
Gold at 20 min
Map pressure
Absorbs damage
Plays teamfights
Team damage

What it is not

Few duels
No poke
No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 8 in lane, 16 in mid game and 35 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

467-61 vs 528

806-94 vs 899

1,146-33 vs 1,179

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Aniviamid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 71% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners

2.9takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 8 of 100 among mid laners467 · median 528
Damage in mid game · rank 16 of 100 among mid laners806 · median 899
Damage in late game · rank 35 of 100 among mid laners1,146 · median 1,179
Gold at 15 min · rank 33 of 100 among mid laners-135 · median +25
Gold at 20 min · rank 29 of 100 among mid laners-186 · median +71
Map pressure · rank 34 of 100 among mid laners2.9 · median 3.2
Absorbs damage · rank 52 of 100 among mid laners497 · median 489
Plays teamfights · rank 57 of 100 among mid laners56% · median 55%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 20 of 100 among mid laners18% · median 23%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 88 of 100 among mid lanersrank 88 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 97 of 100 among mid laners1.6 · median 0.7
Team damage · rank 50 of 100 among mid laners21% · median 21%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Sivir in amateur play: +22.0 pts over 36 games, range above zero.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

Renekton58.8% · expected 48.0% · 34 g+10.9 ptSoloQ -0.5

Sion58.1% · expected 50.0% · 43 g+8.1 ptSoloQ +3.5

K'Sante57.1% · expected 51.9% · 49 g+5.3 ptSoloQ +3.2

Zaahen53.1% · expected 47.3% · 32 g+5.8 ptSoloQ -3.8

Dr. Mundo57.6% · expected 52.6% · 33 g+4.9 ptSoloQ +4.3

Junglegap to expected

Jarvan IV51.5% · expected 51.2% · 68 g+0.3 ptSoloQ +3.0

Sylas50.0% · expected 48.4% · 46 g+1.6 ptSoloQ +0.3

Midgap to expected

Viktor63.5% · expected 49.2% · 63 g+14.3 ptSoloQ -0.6

Xerath52.4% · expected 50.6% · 42 g+1.8 ptSoloQ -1.0

Yone48.5% · expected 47.4% · 33 g+1.1 ptSoloQ +0.3

ADCgap to expected

Sivir72.2% · expected 50.3% · 36 g+22.0 ptSoloQ +0.8

Xayah54.9% · expected 48.5% · 51 g+6.5 ptSoloQ +3.1

Yunara49.5% · expected 47.3% · 93 g+2.1 ptSoloQ -3.5

Ashe53.7% · expected 48.0% · 41 g+5.7 ptSoloQ -0.1

Ezreal54.9% · expected 52.9% · 51 g+2.0 ptSoloQ -0.3

Supportgap to expected

Rell55.6% · expected 46.1% · 36 g+9.4 ptSoloQ -1.3

Braum54.7% · expected 48.0% · 53 g+6.8 ptSoloQ +1.5

Leona55.4% · expected 50.6% · 65 g+4.7 ptSoloQ +0.7

Rakan55.6% · expected 48.8% · 36 g+6.7 ptSoloQ -0.7

Lulu53.9% · expected 52.3% · 89 g+1.7 ptSoloQ -0.1

With

Topgap to expected

Ambessa61.4% · expected 50.3% · 44 g+11.1 ptSoloQ +2.6

Renekton54.8% · expected 51.4% · 42 g+3.4 ptSoloQ -1.5

Aatrox52.3% · expected 51.5% · 44 g+0.8 ptSoloQ -0.7

Junglegap to expected

Vi53.5% · expected 50.3% · 43 g+3.2 ptSoloQ +2.1

Sylas51.5% · expected 50.9% · 33 g+0.6 ptSoloQ +0.9

ADCgap to expected

Aphelios62.5% · expected 46.0% · 32 g+16.5 ptSoloQ -1.0

Caitlyn55.1% · expected 51.2% · 78 g+4.0 ptSoloQ +1.7

Ezreal49.3% · expected 46.4% · 69 g+2.8 ptSoloQ -2.2

Kai'Sa52.9% · expected 49.1% · 51 g+3.8 ptSoloQ +0.3

Jhin50.0% · expected 47.3% · 56 g+2.7 ptSoloQ +1.0

Supportgap to expected

Nautilus55.7% · expected 49.7% · 79 g+6.0 ptSoloQ +0.8

Rell61.0% · expected 53.2% · 41 g+7.8 ptSoloQ -0.4

Seraphine55.2% · expected 51.0% · 67 g+4.2 ptSoloQ +0.7

Thresh55.8% · expected 51.1% · 43 g+4.7 ptSoloQ +1.3

Alistar55.9% · expected 51.1% · 34 g+4.8 ptSoloQ -4.1

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top24 champions