Tournament presence · pick + ban
18.4%#33 of 173 champions
Pick
6.9%picked in 1,886 of 27,182 games
Ban
11.5%2,567 bans over 22,310 games, against 10.9% in soloQ
Win rate as Top50.9% between 48.8% and 53.0% over 1,515 gamesSoloQ 50.0%: no clear gap
Median length28.8 minsoloQ 27.1 min

Amateur: 27,223 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 66% · EUW 24% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 856,529 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    1.9%
    SoloQ
    1.7%
    1.9% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.7% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned less often in amateur play
    Amateur
    8.0%
    SoloQ
    10.9%
    8.0% ban rate in amateur play over 13,367 games, against 10.9% in soloQ over 323,918 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    28.8 min
    SoloQ
    27.1 min
    Median of 28.8 min in amateur play, against 27.1 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Fleet Footwork, then Trinity Force, Frozen Heart, and Spirit Visage: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesFleet Footwork74% · 26,447
Same in amateur play
SpellsGhost + Teleport40% · 14,294
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 96% · 69 games
Core (3 legendaries)21% · 2,313
21%of soloQ games
  1. Trinity Force
  2. Frozen Heart
  3. Spirit Visage
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Absorbs damage first: absorbs more than 94% of top laners.

  1. Absorbs damagetop7%1,565 · top laners: 970

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners

What marks it

  • Frontline
  • Split-push

Like other top laners

  • Gold at 20 min
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills
  • Crowd control (CC)
  • Team damage

What it is not

  • No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 15 in lane, 91 in mid game and 77 in late game, out of 100 top laners.

537-62 vs 599
978+110 vs 868
1,171+92 vs 1,079
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Nasustop laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 73% of top laners against the direct opponent.

top laners

Where it stands among top laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 15 of 100 among top laners537 · median 599
  • Damage in mid game · rank 91 of 100 among top laners978 · median 868
  • Damage in late game · rank 77 of 100 among top laners1,171 · median 1,079
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 16 of 100 among top laners-404 · median +119
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 28 of 100 among top laners-177 · median +100
  • Absorbs damage · rank 94 of 100 among top laners1,565 · median 970
  • Plays teamfights · rank 57 of 100 among top laners54% · median 53%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 55 of 100 among top laners29% · median 28%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 72 of 100 among top lanersrank 72 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 40 of 100 among top laners0.7 · median 0.8
  • Team damage · rank 59 of 100 among top laners22% · median 20%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Tristana in amateur play: +16.6 pts over 62 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Olaf60.4% · expected 47.7% · 53 g+12.7 ptSoloQ +0.9
Mordekaiser55.6% · expected 50.2% · 45 g+5.4 ptSoloQ -1.4
Aatrox52.4% · expected 49.1% · 42 g+3.3 ptSoloQ -5.4
Dr. Mundo54.2% · expected 53.9% · 72 g+0.3 ptSoloQ +1.9
K'Sante54.2% · expected 53.1% · 59 g+1.1 ptSoloQ -2.8
Junglegap to expected
Naafiri63.6% · expected 49.3% · 33 g+14.4 ptSoloQ +1.3
Lillia59.1% · expected 48.0% · 44 g+11.1 ptSoloQ +1.9
Lee Sin54.6% · expected 51.2% · 163 g+3.4 ptSoloQ +0.5
Wukong52.7% · expected 48.8% · 93 g+3.9 ptSoloQ -2.3
Sejuani61.1% · expected 53.3% · 36 g+7.8 ptSoloQ -3.5
Midgap to expected
Aurora63.4% · expected 51.9% · 41 g+11.5 ptSoloQ +1.6
Vex61.9% · expected 50.9% · 42 g+11.0 ptSoloQ -1.9
Akali58.9% · expected 50.6% · 56 g+8.3 ptSoloQ -0.1
LeBlanc56.4% · expected 50.3% · 39 g+6.1 ptSoloQ -0.5
Sylas52.9% · expected 51.0% · 85 g+1.9 ptSoloQ -0.9
ADCgap to expected
Tristana67.7% · expected 51.1% · 62 g+16.6 ptSoloQ +0.3
Lucian54.3% · expected 51.2% · 94 g+3.0 ptSoloQ -0.9
Jhin55.7% · expected 53.2% · 79 g+2.5 ptSoloQ -2.7
Sivir55.0% · expected 51.5% · 60 g+3.5 ptSoloQ +0.9
Ashe50.9% · expected 49.2% · 57 g+1.7 ptSoloQ -0.4
Supportgap to expected
Braum59.1% · expected 49.2% · 93 g+10.0 ptSoloQ -1.8
Neeko63.6% · expected 49.6% · 33 g+14.1 ptSoloQ +0.2
Seraphine57.5% · expected 49.5% · 80 g+8.0 ptSoloQ -1.3
Rakan56.5% · expected 50.1% · 62 g+6.4 ptSoloQ -1.2
Karma61.2% · expected 53.8% · 49 g+7.4 ptSoloQ +1.3

With

Junglegap to expected
Sejuani62.8% · expected 48.5% · 43 g+14.3 ptSoloQ -0.3
Xin Zhao56.3% · expected 49.9% · 48 g+6.3 ptSoloQ -1.2
Vi53.9% · expected 51.6% · 89 g+2.4 ptSoloQ +2.1
Lillia57.1% · expected 53.8% · 42 g+3.4 ptSoloQ +0.4
Jayce51.4% · expected 48.9% · 35 g+2.5 ptSoloQ +1.0
Midgap to expected
Syndra57.0% · expected 51.6% · 100 g+5.4 ptSoloQ +0.9
Viktor56.1% · expected 51.4% · 98 g+4.7 ptSoloQ -2.0
Lissandra56.4% · expected 49.6% · 55 g+6.7 ptSoloQ -2.8
Akali57.4% · expected 51.2% · 47 g+6.3 ptSoloQ -1.5
Ahri53.9% · expected 52.6% · 89 g+1.3 ptSoloQ -1.4
ADCgap to expected
Caitlyn60.3% · expected 52.4% · 121 g+7.9 ptSoloQ -0.2
Lucian58.8% · expected 50.6% · 85 g+8.3 ptSoloQ -0.5
Kai'Sa55.0% · expected 50.3% · 120 g+4.7 ptSoloQ -1.1
Yunara56.9% · expected 53.2% · 144 g+3.7 ptSoloQ +0.8
Sivir56.7% · expected 50.3% · 60 g+6.4 ptSoloQ +1.8
Supportgap to expected
Milio64.3% · expected 49.5% · 70 g+14.8 ptSoloQ -1.7
Nautilus58.8% · expected 51.0% · 153 g+7.8 ptSoloQ -0.6
Karma54.7% · expected 48.0% · 53 g+6.8 ptSoloQ -1.3
Lulu50.7% · expected 48.3% · 140 g+2.4 ptSoloQ +0.3
Alistar56.5% · expected 52.3% · 69 g+4.2 ptSoloQ 0.0

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top25 champions
  • Malphite118 games
    49.2%gap -2.0 ptsSoloQ: 53.2% · 1,349 g
  • Ornn83 games
    44.6%gap -6.0 ptsSoloQ: 51.6% · 756 g
  • Dr. Mundo72 games
    54.2%gap +0.3 ptsSoloQ: 53.2% · 785 g
  • Garen71 games
    50.7%gap -3.0 ptsSoloQ: 46.7% · 1,365 g
  • Sion71 games
    47.9%gap -3.4 ptsSoloQ: 48.8% · 551 g
Jungle21 champions
  • Lee Sin163 games
    54.6%gap +3.4 ptsSoloQ: 50.8% · 2,597 g
  • Jarvan IV112 games
    48.2%gap -4.2 ptsSoloQ: 49.7% · 1,220 g
  • Vi98 games
    49.0%gap -1.2 ptsSoloQ: 50.0% · 762 g
  • Wukong93 games
    52.7%gap +3.9 ptsSoloQ: 46.9% · 1,209 g
  • Sylas92 games
    40.2%gap -9.4 ptsSoloQ: 49.4% · 1,376 g
Mid21 champions
  • Ahri90 games
    50.0%gap +0.8 ptsSoloQ: 49.1% · 1,549 g
  • Viktor90 games
    47.8%gap -2.6 ptsSoloQ: 49.9% · 1,704 g
  • Sylas85 games
    52.9%gap +1.9 ptsSoloQ: 50.4% · 1,354 g
  • Syndra81 games
    49.4%gap -0.8 ptsSoloQ: 49.5% · 1,567 g
  • Orianna70 games
    50.0%gap -3.2 ptsSoloQ: 53.9% · 653 g
ADC17 champions
  • Yunara169 games
    48.5%gap -0.1 ptsSoloQ: 48.6% · 3,025 g
  • Kai'Sa134 games
    47.0%gap -4.4 ptsSoloQ: 54.0% · 3,013 g
  • Caitlyn118 games
    47.5%gap -1.9 ptsSoloQ: 51.6% · 1,906 g
  • Ezreal99 games
    53.5%gap -0.6 ptsSoloQ: 54.8% · 1,982 g
  • Jinx94 games
    42.6%gap -6.3 ptsSoloQ: 47.9% · 2,503 g
Support18 champions
  • Nautilus147 games
    45.6%gap -5.2 ptsSoloQ: 51.5% · 2,100 g
  • Lulu140 games
    49.3%gap -4.2 ptsSoloQ: 49.3% · 2,650 g
  • Milio99 games
    51.5%gap -0.7 ptsSoloQ: 52.7% · 987 g
  • Leona98 games
    52.0%gap +0.2 ptsSoloQ: 47.6% · 1,349 g
  • Braum93 games
    59.1%gap +10.0 ptsSoloQ: 46.2% · 1,108 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Top

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.7%29,099 picks of 1,713,040ban 10.9% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments1.9%652 picks of 34,524ban 8.0% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.6%13 picks of 2,204bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

8.0% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Top
  • 4.9%G1329 games of 6,729
  • 4.7%G2313 games of 6,731
  • 5.5%G3+150 games of 2,703
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 329 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.