udrafter
Champion sheet · Mid

Vex

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · All regions
Tournament presence · pick + ban
8.5%#88 of 173 champions
Pick
3.9%picked in 1,052 of 27,199 games
Ban
4.6%1,035 bans over 22,322 games, against 3.0% in soloQ
Win rate as Mid50.0% between 47.4% and 52.5% over 1,033 gamesSoloQ 51.8%: no clear gap
Median length29.3 minsoloQ 27.3 min

Amateur: 27,223 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 66% · EUW 24% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 856,529 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    1.9%
    SoloQ
    1.4%
    1.9% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.4% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    4.9%
    SoloQ
    3.0%
    4.9% ban rate in amateur play over 13,367 games, against 3.0% in soloQ over 323,918 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29.3 min
    SoloQ
    27.3 min
    Median of 29.3 min in amateur play, against 27.3 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Electrocute, then Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesElectrocute83% · 22,267
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Ignite75% · 20,106
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 100% · 86 games
Core (3 legendaries)31% · 3,206
31%of soloQ games
  1. Luden's Echo
  2. Shadowflame
  3. Zhonya's Hourglass
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 81% of mid laners.

  1. Crowd control (CC)top19%1.1 · mid laners: 0.7
  2. Map pressuretop20%4.1 · mid laners: 3.2

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

  • Map pressure
  • CC

Like other mid laners

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in mid game
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Absorbs damage
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills
  • Team damage

What it is not

  • No poke
  • No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 74 in lane, 74 in mid game and 70 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

574+46 vs 528
964+65 vs 899
1,271+92 vs 1,179
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Vexmid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 67% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners
4.1takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 74 of 100 among mid laners574 · median 528
  • Damage in mid game · rank 74 of 100 among mid laners964 · median 899
  • Damage in late game · rank 70 of 100 among mid laners1,271 · median 1,179
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 40 of 100 among mid laners-52 · median +25
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 33 of 100 among mid laners-171 · median +71
  • Map pressure · rank 80 of 100 among mid laners4.1 · median 3.2
  • Absorbs damage · rank 45 of 100 among mid laners457 · median 489
  • Plays teamfights · rank 63 of 100 among mid laners56% · median 55%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 47 of 100 among mid laners22% · median 23%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 42 of 100 among mid lanersrank 42 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 81 of 100 among mid laners1.1 · median 0.7
  • Team damage · rank 73 of 100 among mid laners24% · median 21%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Milio in amateur play: +14.7 pts over 53 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Ambessa58.1% · expected 49.2% · 43 g+8.9 ptSoloQ +4.6
Renekton55.0% · expected 48.2% · 40 g+6.8 ptSoloQ -1.7
K'Sante54.3% · expected 52.1% · 46 g+2.2 ptSoloQ +2.7
Ornn51.0% · expected 49.7% · 49 g+1.3 ptSoloQ +0.1
Junglegap to expected
Vi54.1% · expected 49.3% · 74 g+4.8 ptSoloQ +6.5
Lee Sin51.6% · expected 50.3% · 93 g+1.3 ptSoloQ -0.2
Sylas50.0% · expected 48.7% · 68 g+1.3 ptSoloQ +1.5
Nocturne58.1% · expected 52.7% · 31 g+5.4 ptSoloQ -4.9
Viego56.3% · expected 51.5% · 32 g+4.7 ptSoloQ +0.5
Midgap to expected
LeBlanc59.0% · expected 49.3% · 100 g+9.7 ptSoloQ +2.8
Sylas57.3% · expected 50.1% · 75 g+7.3 ptSoloQ +4.1
Syndra57.4% · expected 49.3% · 54 g+8.1 ptSoloQ -2.0
Ahri54.8% · expected 48.2% · 73 g+6.6 ptSoloQ +0.3
Lissandra58.1% · expected 51.2% · 31 g+6.9 ptSoloQ +7.5
ADCgap to expected
Jhin60.6% · expected 52.2% · 66 g+8.4 ptSoloQ -1.8
Jinx54.7% · expected 47.9% · 75 g+6.8 ptSoloQ 0.0
Miss Fortune61.1% · expected 50.6% · 36 g+10.6 ptSoloQ +1.4
Xayah54.7% · expected 48.7% · 64 g+6.0 ptSoloQ +0.5
Caitlyn52.7% · expected 48.5% · 91 g+4.3 ptSoloQ +1.0
Supportgap to expected
Milio66.0% · expected 51.3% · 53 g+14.7 ptSoloQ -0.4
Thresh61.4% · expected 48.5% · 70 g+12.9 ptSoloQ -0.1
Rakan57.1% · expected 49.1% · 56 g+8.0 ptSoloQ +0.4
Rell51.2% · expected 46.4% · 41 g+4.8 ptSoloQ +2.7
Nautilus50.5% · expected 49.9% · 91 g+0.7 ptSoloQ +0.3

With

Topgap to expected
Aatrox61.8% · expected 51.8% · 34 g+10.0 ptSoloQ -0.6
Yone58.8% · expected 49.8% · 34 g+9.0 ptSoloQ -0.6
Nasus56.8% · expected 50.8% · 37 g+5.9 ptSoloQ -2.0
Renekton53.2% · expected 51.7% · 47 g+1.5 ptSoloQ +2.7
Gnar48.6% · expected 48.4% · 35 g+0.2 ptSoloQ +2.4
Junglegap to expected
Sylas59.2% · expected 51.2% · 49 g+8.0 ptSoloQ +0.4
Wukong53.5% · expected 52.1% · 86 g+1.4 ptSoloQ -0.5
Viego51.1% · expected 48.4% · 45 g+2.7 ptSoloQ -0.4
ADCgap to expected
Miss Fortune64.5% · expected 49.3% · 31 g+15.2 ptSoloQ -2.0
Caitlyn58.2% · expected 51.4% · 91 g+6.8 ptSoloQ +1.1
Lucian57.6% · expected 49.6% · 66 g+8.0 ptSoloQ +1.4
Tristana57.1% · expected 49.7% · 49 g+7.4 ptSoloQ +0.2
Aphelios55.9% · expected 46.3% · 34 g+9.6 ptSoloQ +1.2
Supportgap to expected
Thresh56.6% · expected 51.4% · 76 g+5.2 ptSoloQ +2.6
Nautilus54.3% · expected 50.0% · 92 g+4.3 ptSoloQ +1.3
Rakan57.1% · expected 50.8% · 42 g+6.3 ptSoloQ -1.0
Braum54.7% · expected 51.6% · 64 g+3.0 ptSoloQ -1.9
Lulu48.3% · expected 47.3% · 87 g+0.9 ptSoloQ 0.0

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top24 champions
  • Malphite52 games
    48.1%gap -2.1 ptsSoloQ: 46.7% · 870 g
  • Ornn49 games
    51.0%gap +1.3 ptsSoloQ: 51.0% · 500 g
  • K'Sante46 games
    54.3%gap +2.2 ptsSoloQ: 56.4% · 721 g
  • Ambessa43 games
    58.1%gap +8.9 ptsSoloQ: 57.7% · 652 g
  • Nasus42 games
    38.1%gap -11.0 ptsSoloQ: 53.7% · 419 g
Jungle21 champions
  • Lee Sin93 games
    51.6%gap +1.3 ptsSoloQ: 51.9% · 1,997 g
  • Wukong89 games
    44.9%gap -2.9 ptsSoloQ: 53.5% · 890 g
  • Vi74 games
    54.1%gap +4.8 ptsSoloQ: 60.1% · 609 g
  • Sylas68 games
    50.0%gap +1.3 ptsSoloQ: 52.9% · 1,431 g
  • Jarvan IV65 games
    44.6%gap -6.9 ptsSoloQ: 53.1% · 848 g
Mid19 champions
  • LeBlanc100 games
    59.0%gap +9.7 ptsSoloQ: 53.3% · 1,926 g
  • Sylas75 games
    57.3%gap +7.3 ptsSoloQ: 57.2% · 1,198 g
  • Ahri73 games
    54.8%gap +6.6 ptsSoloQ: 51.1% · 1,129 g
  • Syndra54 games
    57.4%gap +8.1 ptsSoloQ: 49.2% · 1,097 g
  • Yone48 games
    47.9%gap +0.2 ptsSoloQ: 56.4% · 1,208 g
ADC18 champions
  • Yunara97 games
    49.5%gap +1.9 ptsSoloQ: 50.5% · 2,170 g
  • Caitlyn91 games
    52.7%gap +4.3 ptsSoloQ: 54.0% · 1,468 g
  • Kai'Sa88 games
    54.5%gap +4.0 ptsSoloQ: 51.5% · 2,348 g
  • Jinx75 games
    54.7%gap +6.8 ptsSoloQ: 50.3% · 1,769 g
  • Jhin66 games
    60.6%gap +8.4 ptsSoloQ: 50.3% · 2,491 g
Support17 champions
  • Lulu97 games
    52.6%gap 0.0 ptsSoloQ: 50.8% · 1,909 g
  • Nautilus91 games
    50.5%gap +0.7 ptsSoloQ: 52.9% · 1,623 g
  • Thresh70 games
    61.4%gap +12.9 ptsSoloQ: 49.3% · 1,954 g
  • Leona62 games
    45.2%gap -5.8 ptsSoloQ: 53.5% · 1,031 g
  • Braum56 games
    46.4%gap -1.8 ptsSoloQ: 49.2% · 912 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Mid

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.4%23,306 picks of 1,713,048ban 3.0% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments1.9%658 picks of 34,524ban 4.9% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.1%2 picks of 2,204bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

8.2% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Mid
  • 3.2%G1214 games of 6,733
  • 3.8%G2253 games of 6,735
  • 3.7%G3+101 games of 2,706
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 214 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.