Champion sheet · ADC

Ashe

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · EUW

Tournament presence · pick + ban

19.3%#30 of 173 champions

Pick: 12.8%picked in 829 of 6,486 games
Ban: 6.5%212 bans over 3,246 games, against 0.7% in soloQ

Win rate as ADC48.2% between 45.4% and 51.1% over 823 gamesSoloQ 49.9%: no clear gap

Median length28.8 minsoloQ 27.7 min

Amateur: 6,491 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 336,200 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as ADC.DraftLength
How to play itLethal Tempo, then Hexoptics C44, Phantom Dancer, and Infinity Edge: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compCrowd control (CC) first: more CC than 98% of ADC.CC
With / againstBetter than expected against Ambessa in amateur play: +19.0 pts over 35 games, range above zero.+19.0 pt35 games
In draftTaken at any point of the series.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as ADC.

DraftPicked more often in amateur play
Amateur
6.2%
SoloQ
2.4%
6.2% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 2.4% in soloQ.
DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
6.7%
SoloQ
0.7%
6.7% ban rate in amateur play over 1,886 games, against 0.7% in soloQ over 129,307 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
28.8 min
SoloQ
27.7 min
Median of 28.8 min in amateur play, against 27.7 min in soloQ.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Lethal Tempo, then Hexoptics C44, Phantom Dancer, and Infinity Edge: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesLethal Tempo97% · 18,005

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Barrier71% · 13,125

Same in amateur play

SkillsWnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 95% · 94 games

Core (3 legendaries)37% · 3,452

37%of soloQ games

Hexoptics C44
Phantom Dancer
Infinity Edge

Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 98% of ADC.

Crowd control (CC)top2%1.5 · ADC: 0.6

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other ADC

What marks it

Like other ADC

Damage in lane
Damage in mid game
Damage in late game
Absorbs damage
Plays teamfights
Lets allies carry kills
Team damage

What it is not

Few duels
No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 31 in lane, 44 in mid game and 30 in late game, out of 100 ADC.

500-25 vs 525

901-15 vs 915

1,323-43 vs 1,366

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

AsheADC

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 81% of ADC against the direct opponent.

ADC

Where it stands among ADC · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 31 of 100 among ADC500 · median 525
Damage in mid game · rank 44 of 100 among ADC901 · median 915
Damage in late game · rank 30 of 100 among ADC1,323 · median 1,366
Gold at 15 min · rank 16 of 100 among ADC-336 · median -54
Gold at 20 min · rank 19 of 100 among ADC-503 · median -85
Absorbs damage · rank 40 of 100 among ADC334 · median 361
Plays teamfights · rank 69 of 100 among ADC57% · median 56%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 11 of 100 among ADC15% · median 19%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 62 of 100 among ADCrank 62 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 98 of 100 among ADC1.5 · median 0.6
Team damage · rank 51 of 100 among ADC23% · median 23%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Ambessa in amateur play: +19.0 pts over 35 games, range above zero.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

Ambessa65.7% · expected 46.7% · 35 g+19.0 ptSoloQ -2.3

Renekton51.1% · expected 45.2% · 45 g+5.9 ptSoloQ +4.4

Junglegap to expected

Vi57.1% · expected 47.8% · 42 g+9.3 ptSoloQ -2.0

Wukong51.7% · expected 48.4% · 118 g+3.3 ptSoloQ -3.0

Sylas48.6% · expected 44.2% · 37 g+4.4 ptSoloQ -3.7

Midgap to expected

Orianna57.7% · expected 48.3% · 52 g+9.4 ptSoloQ -2.0

Sylas43.2% · expected 42.8% · 44 g+0.4 ptSoloQ -4.5

ADCgap to expected

Jhin54.5% · expected 45.7% · 44 g+8.9 ptSoloQ +0.6

Xayah58.8% · expected 48.4% · 34 g+10.4 ptSoloQ +1.9

Jinx53.9% · expected 50.3% · 76 g+3.7 ptSoloQ -1.0

Lucian49.0% · expected 48.1% · 49 g+0.8 ptSoloQ +5.0

Supportgap to expected

Braum58.9% · expected 49.2% · 56 g+9.8 ptSoloQ +0.5

Lulu56.0% · expected 51.1% · 75 g+4.9 ptSoloQ +0.1

Seraphine52.8% · expected 50.8% · 72 g+2.0 ptSoloQ -0.2

Rell48.7% · expected 43.6% · 39 g+5.1 ptSoloQ +1.8

Nami52.9% · expected 49.1% · 34 g+3.8 ptSoloQ +1.6

With

Topgap to expected

K'Sante55.6% · expected 46.1% · 36 g+9.4 ptSoloQ -0.9

Dr. Mundo48.7% · expected 40.0% · 39 g+8.8 ptSoloQ -1.3

Renekton58.5% · expected 51.3% · 41 g+7.2 ptSoloQ +1.1

Junglegap to expected

Skarner60.6% · expected 45.6% · 33 g+15.0 ptSoloQ +0.6

Wukong49.6% · expected 48.1% · 113 g+1.5 ptSoloQ +1.0

Vi50.0% · expected 48.6% · 42 g+1.4 ptSoloQ -1.4

Midgap to expected

Ryze65.7% · expected 49.9% · 35 g+15.9 ptSoloQ +2.2

Orianna51.5% · expected 48.2% · 68 g+3.3 ptSoloQ -2.4

Viktor51.2% · expected 48.9% · 82 g+2.4 ptSoloQ -2.4

Ahri50.7% · expected 47.6% · 67 g+3.2 ptSoloQ +0.2

Hwei51.1% · expected 50.0% · 47 g+1.0 ptSoloQ +0.1

Supportgap to expected

Seraphine50.5% · expected 45.7% · 444 g+4.7 ptSoloQ +3.0

Milio50.0% · expected 47.9% · 52 g+2.1 ptSoloQ +0.7

Nautilus55.6% · expected 51.9% · 36 g+3.6 ptSoloQ -5.7

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top22 champions