Champion sheet · Mid

Viktor

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · EUW

Tournament presence · pick + ban

39.8%#4 of 173 champions

Pick: 20.8%picked in 1,350 of 6,488 games
Ban: 19.0%617 bans over 3,246 games, against 14.0% in soloQ

Win rate as Mid50.6% between 48.3% and 53.0% over 1,211 gamesSoloQ 49.5%: no clear gap

Median length28.7 minsoloQ 27.9 min

Amateur: 6,491 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 336,200 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.DraftLength
How to play itDeathfire Touch, then Blackfire Torch, Lich Bane, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compTeam damage first: more damage than 100% of mid laners.TeamfightDamagePoke
With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
In draftPriority pick: taken in G1, burned afterwards.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

DraftPicked more often in amateur play
Amateur
9.4%
SoloQ
4.0%
9.4% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 4.0% in soloQ.
DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
17.5%
SoloQ
14.0%
17.5% ban rate in amateur play over 1,886 games, against 14.0% in soloQ over 129,307 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
28.7 min
SoloQ
27.9 min
Median of 28.7 min in amateur play, against 27.9 min in soloQ.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Deathfire Touch, then Blackfire Torch, Lich Bane, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesDeathfire Touch93% · 29,052

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Teleport80% · 24,784

Same in amateur play

SkillsEnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 99% · 133 games

Core (3 legendaries)16% · 1,984

16%of soloQ games

Blackfire Torch
Lich Bane
Zhonya's Hourglass

Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Team damage first: more damage than 100% of mid laners.

Team damagetop1%27% · mid laners: 21%
Plays teamfightstop21%58% · mid laners: 55%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

Teamfight
Damage
Poke

Like other mid laners

Gold at 15 min
Gold at 20 min
Map pressure
Absorbs damage
Takes its kills in duels
Lets allies carry kills
Crowd control (CC)

What it is not

No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 98 in lane, 99 in mid game and 87 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

617+89 vs 528

1,066+166 vs 899

1,432+253 vs 1,179

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Viktormid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 54% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners

2.9takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 98 of 100 among mid laners617 · median 528
Damage in mid game · rank 99 of 100 among mid laners1,066 · median 899
Damage in late game · rank 87 of 100 among mid laners1,432 · median 1,179
Gold at 15 min · rank 43 of 100 among mid laners-38 · median +25
Gold at 20 min · rank 46 of 100 among mid laners-3 · median +71
Map pressure · rank 34 of 100 among mid laners2.9 · median 3.2
Absorbs damage · rank 65 of 100 among mid laners591 · median 489
Plays teamfights · rank 79 of 100 among mid laners58% · median 55%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 26 of 100 among mid laners19% · median 23%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 65 of 100 among mid lanersrank 65 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 71 of 100 among mid laners0.9 · median 0.7
Team damage · rank 100 of 100 among mid laners27% · median 21%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

Shen67.6% · expected 55.0% · 37 g+12.6 ptSoloQ +3.1

Malphite63.8% · expected 57.0% · 47 g+6.8 ptSoloQ -2.5

Rumble51.5% · expected 44.3% · 33 g+7.3 ptSoloQ +1.4

Renekton52.1% · expected 47.5% · 48 g+4.6 ptSoloQ +2.4

Gnar54.1% · expected 52.3% · 61 g+1.8 ptSoloQ -0.5

Junglegap to expected

Skarner61.5% · expected 53.3% · 52 g+8.3 ptSoloQ -0.3

Wukong53.0% · expected 50.8% · 181 g+2.3 ptSoloQ +0.3

Vi54.8% · expected 50.2% · 73 g+4.6 ptSoloQ +1.3

Xin Zhao53.5% · expected 51.1% · 86 g+2.4 ptSoloQ -1.2

Lee Sin46.4% · expected 43.8% · 56 g+2.7 ptSoloQ -1.9

Midgap to expected

Galio63.9% · expected 53.5% · 36 g+10.4 ptSoloQ +1.2

Orianna53.6% · expected 50.7% · 112 g+2.9 ptSoloQ +0.8

Syndra50.3% · expected 49.8% · 187 g+0.5 ptSoloQ +0.3

Akali47.8% · expected 45.1% · 67 g+2.7 ptSoloQ -2.0

Ahri51.3% · expected 51.2% · 115 g+0.1 ptSoloQ 0.0

ADCgap to expected

Tristana55.0% · expected 47.4% · 80 g+7.6 ptSoloQ -2.0

Zeri61.5% · expected 51.0% · 39 g+10.5 ptSoloQ +1.6

Yunara51.9% · expected 48.4% · 156 g+3.5 ptSoloQ -1.2

Sivir58.9% · expected 53.8% · 73 g+5.1 ptSoloQ +0.8

Xayah55.6% · expected 50.8% · 63 g+4.7 ptSoloQ +1.3

Supportgap to expected

Lulu56.2% · expected 53.4% · 146 g+2.7 ptSoloQ -0.7

Braum55.4% · expected 51.5% · 83 g+3.9 ptSoloQ +2.0

Seraphine57.0% · expected 53.2% · 79 g+3.8 ptSoloQ -2.4

Nautilus48.3% · expected 47.0% · 118 g+1.4 ptSoloQ +0.6

Karma55.4% · expected 52.6% · 74 g+2.8 ptSoloQ +1.6

With

Topgap to expected

Ornn54.1% · expected 48.6% · 133 g+5.5 ptSoloQ +0.7

Malphite51.9% · expected 44.2% · 54 g+7.7 ptSoloQ +1.1

Ambessa57.6% · expected 52.1% · 59 g+5.5 ptSoloQ +1.5

K'Sante50.0% · expected 48.5% · 76 g+1.5 ptSoloQ -4.4

Camille60.5% · expected 56.9% · 38 g+3.7 ptSoloQ +2.6

Junglegap to expected

Xin Zhao56.3% · expected 50.1% · 103 g+6.2 ptSoloQ -0.1

Lee Sin67.7% · expected 57.5% · 31 g+10.3 ptSoloQ +0.1

Vi54.9% · expected 51.0% · 71 g+3.9 ptSoloQ -1.3

Nocturne54.3% · expected 46.3% · 35 g+8.0 ptSoloQ +0.7

Skarner50.0% · expected 48.0% · 64 g+2.0 ptSoloQ +3.1

ADCgap to expected

Ezreal58.4% · expected 49.4% · 77 g+9.0 ptSoloQ -1.6

Lucian59.6% · expected 50.7% · 47 g+8.9 ptSoloQ +1.4

Varus65.6% · expected 56.0% · 32 g+9.6 ptSoloQ -0.4

Yunara53.9% · expected 52.8% · 141 g+1.1 ptSoloQ -2.2

Xayah53.5% · expected 50.4% · 71 g+3.1 ptSoloQ +2.9

Supportgap to expected

Braum55.1% · expected 49.7% · 107 g+5.4 ptSoloQ +0.5

Milio56.8% · expected 50.3% · 81 g+6.5 ptSoloQ -0.6

Rakan60.0% · expected 53.4% · 75 g+6.6 ptSoloQ -0.1

Nautilus54.9% · expected 54.3% · 122 g+0.6 ptSoloQ -0.3

Alistar53.5% · expected 51.0% · 43 g+2.5 ptSoloQ +0.5

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top25 champions