Tournament presence · pick + ban
13.2%#55 of 173 champions
Pick
4.7%picked in 307 of 6,486 games
Ban
8.5%275 bans over 3,246 games, against 3.7% in soloQ
Win rate as Top58.3% between 44.7% and 70.8% over 36 gamesSoloQ 51.6%: no clear gap
Median length29.7 minsoloQ 27.9 min

Amateur: 6,491 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 336,200 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

2 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

  • DraftPicked less often in amateur play
    Amateur
    0.3%
    SoloQ
    0.5%
    0.3% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 0.5% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    8.9%
    SoloQ
    3.7%
    8.9% ban rate in amateur play over 1,886 games, against 3.7% in soloQ over 129,307 games.

Not enough games to judge: core.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Electrocute, then Rod of Ages, Malignance, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesElectrocute51% · 2,204
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Teleport64% · 2,759
Same in amateur play
SkillsEnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 96% · 44 games
Core (3 legendaries)23% · 368
23%of soloQ games
  1. Rod of Ages
  2. Malignance
  3. Zhonya's Hourglass
Amateur: Rod of Ages, Malignance, Bloodletter's Curse, gap not settled

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 95% of top laners.

  1. Crowd control (CC)top5%1.6 · top laners: 0.8
  2. Plays teamfightstop11%58% · top laners: 53%
  3. Lets allies carry killstop16%rank 84 of 100

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners

What marks it

  • Teamfight
  • Lets allies carry
  • CC

Like other top laners

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Team damage

What it is not

  • Few duels
  • No poke
  • No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 46 in lane, 18 in mid game and 39 in late game, out of 100 top laners.

596-4 vs 599
809-59 vs 868
1,046-33 vs 1,079
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Aniviatop laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 64% of top laners against the direct opponent.

top laners

Where it stands among top laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 46 of 100 among top laners596 · median 599
  • Damage in mid game · rank 18 of 100 among top laners809 · median 868
  • Damage in late game · rank 39 of 100 among top laners1,046 · median 1,079
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 39 of 100 among top laners+22 · median +119
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 36 of 100 among top laners-39 · median +100
  • Absorbs damage · rank 19 of 100 among top laners507 · median 970
  • Plays teamfights · rank 89 of 100 among top laners58% · median 53%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 11 of 100 among top laners22% · median 28%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 84 of 100 among top lanersrank 84 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 95 of 100 among top laners1.6 · median 0.8
  • Team damage · rank 41 of 100 among top laners20% · median 20%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

Junglegap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top1 champion
  • Olaf5 games
    —SoloQ: 50.0% · 64 g
Jungle1 champion
  • Wukong6 games
    —SoloQ: 49.7% · 169 g
Mid2 champions
  • Syndra7 games
    —SoloQ: 44.7% · 266 g
  • Viktor5 games
    —SoloQ: 52.0% · 177 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Not enough series to settle it: raw counts only.

Pick rate as Top

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+0.5%3,679 picks of 672,391ban 3.7% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments0.3%26 picks of 9,366ban 8.9% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.7%15 picks of 2,204bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

11.9% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Top
Once picked, the series moves on to

Not enough series yet: published from 30.

Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.