Tournament presence · pick + ban
5.7%#114 of 173 champions
Pick
2.9%picked in 517 of 18,051 games
Ban
2.8%479 bans over 17,105 games, against 0.5% in soloQ
Win rate as ADC56.1% between 47.8% and 64.1% over 98 gamesSoloQ 51.7%: no clear gap
Median length29.1 minsoloQ 26.1 min

Amateur: 18,068 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 304,693 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as ADC.

  • DraftPicked less often in amateur play
    Amateur
    0.3%
    SoloQ
    0.5%
    0.3% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 0.5% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    2.4%
    SoloQ
    0.5%
    2.4% ban rate in amateur play over 10,152 games, against 0.5% in soloQ over 112,312 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29.1 min
    SoloQ
    26.1 min
    Median of 29.1 min in amateur play, against 26.1 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Conqueror, then Malignance, Rylai's Crystal Scepter, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesConqueror78% · 2,464
Same in amateur play
SpellsExhaust + Flash52% · 1,621
Amateur: Flash + Ghost (52%), gap not settled
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 100% · 74 games
Core (3 legendaries)20% · 260
20%of soloQ games
  1. Malignance
  2. Rylai's Crystal Scepter
  3. Zhonya's Hourglass
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 100% of ADC.

  1. Crowd control (CC)top1%1.6 · ADC: 0.6
  2. Absorbs damagetop4%637 · ADC: 361
  3. Lets allies carry killstop18%rank 82 of 100

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other ADC

What marks it

  • Frontline
  • Lets allies carry
  • CC

Like other ADC

  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Team damage

What it is not

  • No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 79 in lane, 79 in mid game and 80 in late game, out of 100 ADC.

575+50 vs 525
1,037+121 vs 915
1,493+127 vs 1,366
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
SwainADC

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 70% of ADC against the direct opponent.

ADC

Where it stands among ADC · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 79 of 100 among ADC575 · median 525
  • Damage in mid game · rank 79 of 100 among ADC1,037 · median 915
  • Damage in late game · rank 80 of 100 among ADC1,493 · median 1,366
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 33 of 100 among ADC-135 · median -54
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 30 of 100 among ADC-289 · median -85
  • Absorbs damage · rank 96 of 100 among ADC637 · median 361
  • Plays teamfights · rank 62 of 100 among ADC57% · median 56%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 53 of 100 among ADC19% · median 19%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 82 of 100 among ADCrank 82 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 100 of 100 among ADC1.6 · median 0.6
  • Team damage · rank 38 of 100 among ADC21% · median 23%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top3 champions
  • Renekton11 games
    —SoloQ: 45.9% · 74 g
  • Nasus6 games
    —SoloQ: 56.0% · 50 g
  • Sion6 games
    —SoloQ: 63.9% · 36 g
Jungle4 champions
  • Lee Sin11 games
    —SoloQ: 52.8% · 392 g
  • Wukong9 games
    —SoloQ: 48.6% · 70 g
  • Jarvan IV7 games
    —SoloQ: 55.7% · 97 g
  • Lillia6 games
    —SoloQ: 52.0% · 75 g
Mid4 champions
  • Yone7 games
    —SoloQ: 47.3% · 146 g
  • Ahri5 games
    —SoloQ: 55.1% · 78 g
  • Orianna5 games
    —SoloQ: 52.1% · 71 g
  • Ryze5 games
    —SoloQ: 53.3% · 60 g
ADC10 champions
  • Kai'Sa11 games
    —SoloQ: 54.0% · 372 g
  • Jinx10 games
    —SoloQ: 47.9% · 169 g
  • Caitlyn7 games
    —SoloQ: 51.8% · 137 g
  • Jhin7 games
    —SoloQ: 53.3% · 375 g
  • Lucian6 games
    —SoloQ: 55.6% · 144 g
Support7 champions
  • Alistar9 games
    —SoloQ: 50.5% · 210 g
  • Nautilus8 games
    —SoloQ: 54.5% · 202 g
  • Braum7 games
    —SoloQ: 60.7% · 84 g
  • Lulu7 games
    —SoloQ: 55.3% · 228 g
  • Thresh7 games
    —SoloQ: 51.5% · 264 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as ADC

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+0.5%2,810 picks of 609,386ban 0.5% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments0.3%56 picks of 21,472ban 2.4% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.1%3 picks of 2,204bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

5.1% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as ADC
  • 0.6%G125 games of 4,078
  • 0.4%G216 games of 4,080
  • 0.7%G3+13 games of 1,754
Once picked, the series moves on to

Not enough series yet: published from 30.

Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.