Champion sheet · Top
Shen
Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · NATournament presence · pick + ban
12.9%#57 of 173 champions
- Pick
- 6.8%picked in 180 of 2,644 games
- Ban
- 6.1%119 bans over 1,958 games, against 1.2% in soloQ
Win rate as Top38.6% between 32.2% and 45.4% over 145 gamesSoloQ 50.9%: clear gap
Median length29.3 minsoloQ 28.2 min
Amateur: 2,664 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, NA. SoloQ Master+: 215,636 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.
At a glance
Four answers, each one opens its chapter.- What changes in tournaments4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.Win rateDraftLength
- How to play itGrasp of the Undying, then Titanic Hydra, Dusk and Dawn, and Randuin's Omen: the most played build in soloQ.
- In a compPlays teamfights first: more teamfights than 91% of top laners.FrontlineTeamfight
- With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
- In draftTaken at any point of the series.
What changes in tournaments?
4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.
- Win rateWins less in amateur play
- Amateur
- 38.6%
- SoloQ
- 50.9%
- DraftPicked more often in amateur play
- Amateur
- 2.8%
- SoloQ
- 2.2%
- DraftBanned more often in amateur play
- Amateur
- 5.8%
- SoloQ
- 1.2%
- LengthLonger games in amateur play
- Amateur
- 29.3 min
- SoloQ
- 28.2 min
How to play it?
Grasp of the Undying, then Titanic Hydra, Dusk and Dawn, and Randuin's Omen: the most played build in soloQ.
RunesGrasp of the Undying98% · 11,177Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Ignite63% · 7,247Amateur: Flash + Teleport (52%), gap not settled
SkillsQnot collected in soloQAmateur: 100% · 155 games
Core (3 legendaries)14% · 354
14%of soloQ games
- Titanic Hydra
- Dusk and Dawn
- Randuin's Omen
Same in amateur play
Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.
What does it bring to a comp?
Plays teamfights first: more teamfights than 91% of top laners.
- Plays teamfightstop9%58% · top laners: 53%
- Absorbs damagetop16%1,327 · top laners: 970
Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners
What marks it
- Frontline
- Teamfight
Like other top laners
- Damage in mid game
- Damage in late game
- Lets allies carry kills
- Crowd control (CC)
What it is not
- Few duels
- Little damage
- No poke
- No split-push
Damage / min by phase · at equal gold
Rank 24 in lane, 38 in mid game and 27 in late game, out of 100 top laners.
553-46 vs 599
841-27 vs 868
992-88 vs 1,079
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Shentop laners
Gold vs. direct opponent
At 20 min, behind 99% of top laners against the direct opponent.
top laners
Where it stands among top laners · every measure
0 ← less · median · more → 100- Damage in lane · rank 24 of 100 among top laners553 · median 599
- Damage in mid game · rank 38 of 100 among top laners841 · median 868
- Damage in late game · rank 27 of 100 among top laners992 · median 1,079
- Gold at 15 min · rank 1 of 100 among top laners-1,012 · median +119
- Gold at 20 min · rank 1 of 100 among top laners-1,410 · median +100
- Absorbs damage · rank 84 of 100 among top laners1,327 · median 970
- Plays teamfights · rank 91 of 100 among top laners58% · median 53%
- Takes its kills in duels · rank 1 of 100 among top laners17% · median 28%
- Lets allies carry kills · rank 71 of 100 among top lanersrank 71 of 100
- Crowd control (CC) · rank 72 of 100 among top laners1.1 · median 0.8
- Team damage · rank 17 of 100 among top laners17% · median 20%
With whom, against whom?
No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
in
Best results
Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.
Against
Topgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
Junglegap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
Midgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
ADCgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
Supportgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
With
Junglegap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
Midgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
ADCgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
Supportgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
Matchups and allies
One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.
Sort by
Top9 champions
- Ornn16 games—SoloQ: 52.9% · 276 g
- K'Sante14 games—SoloQ: 51.5% · 233 g
- Mordekaiser12 games—SoloQ: 51.3% · 374 g
- Sett10 games—SoloQ: 51.5% · 274 g
- Gangplank5 games—SoloQ: 45.9% · 233 g
- Garen5 games—SoloQ: 51.0% · 394 g
- Jax5 games—SoloQ: 55.6% · 329 g
- Renekton5 games—SoloQ: 54.6% · 280 g
- Sion5 games—SoloQ: 53.5% · 202 g
Jungle9 champions
- Jarvan IV20 games—SoloQ: 53.2% · 387 g
- Wukong20 games—SoloQ: 49.2% · 488 g
- Nocturne7 games—SoloQ: 55.6% · 169 g
- Xin Zhao6 games—SoloQ: 54.5% · 123 g
- Graves5 games—SoloQ: 49.5% · 550 g
- Lee Sin5 games—SoloQ: 51.2% · 545 g
- Lillia5 games—SoloQ: 44.1% · 313 g
- Pantheon5 games—SoloQ: 57.1% · 49 g
- Viego5 games—SoloQ: 54.0% · 411 g
Mid9 champions
- Ahri17 games—SoloQ: 53.8% · 572 g
- Syndra16 games—SoloQ: 51.3% · 454 g
- Viktor12 games—SoloQ: 52.0% · 556 g
- Orianna8 games—SoloQ: 47.1% · 210 g
- Hwei7 games—SoloQ: 55.8% · 249 g
- Ryze7 games—SoloQ: 55.1% · 147 g
- Akali6 games—SoloQ: 50.5% · 327 g
- Aurora6 games—SoloQ: 51.8% · 195 g
- Yone6 games—SoloQ: 53.6% · 472 g
ADC12 champions
- Yunara16 games—SoloQ: 48.6% · 830 g
- Jinx14 games—SoloQ: 47.6% · 906 g
- Ashe13 games—SoloQ: 54.1% · 351 g
- Caitlyn11 games—SoloQ: 52.3% · 589 g
- Tristana8 games—SoloQ: 54.7% · 598 g
- Xayah8 games—SoloQ: 47.9% · 288 g
- Ezreal7 games—SoloQ: 55.0% · 520 g
- Jhin7 games—SoloQ: 52.7% · 1,027 g
- Aphelios5 games—SoloQ: 50.6% · 399 g
- Kai'Sa5 games—SoloQ: 54.2% · 736 g
- Lucian5 games—SoloQ: 53.1% · 503 g
- Ziggs5 games—SoloQ: 54.0% · 126 g
Support9 champions
- Lulu17 games—SoloQ: 51.4% · 634 g
- Seraphine16 games—SoloQ: 49.9% · 373 g
- Nautilus13 games—SoloQ: 54.8% · 540 g
- Braum11 games—SoloQ: 54.2% · 310 g
- Karma10 games—SoloQ: 46.0% · 385 g
- Thresh9 games—SoloQ: 47.7% · 780 g
- Milio8 games—SoloQ: 51.6% · 337 g
- Leona7 games—SoloQ: 48.1% · 462 g
- Rakan7 games—SoloQ: 53.4% · 251 g
Ban it or pick it?
Taken at any point of the series.
Pick rate as Top
Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ- SoloQ Master+2.2%9,633 picks of 431,266ban 1.2% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
- Amateur tournaments2.8%102 picks of 3,686ban 5.8% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
- Pro1.0%21 picks of 2,204bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20
Presence by patch
12.8% on 16.2116.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.Within the series
Fearless series only · as Top- 5.0%G137 games of 733
- 6.0%G244 games of 733
- 5.7%G3+18 games of 316
Once picked, the series moves on to
- Ornn4 series
- Mordekaiser3 series
- Renekton3 series
