Champion sheet · Mid

Orianna

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · NA

Tournament presence · pick + ban

24.4%#18 of 173 champions

Pick: 12.0%picked in 317 of 2,644 games
Ban: 12.4%242 bans over 1,958 games, against 0.4% in soloQ

Win rate as Mid46.6% between 42.0% and 51.3% over 311 gamesSoloQ 47.9%: no clear gap

Median length30.4 minsoloQ 28.1 min

Amateur: 2,664 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, NA. SoloQ Master+: 215,636 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.DraftLength
How to play itSummon Aery, then Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, and Rabadon's Deathcap: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compPlays teamfights first: more teamfights than 77% of mid laners.Teamfight
With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
In draftTaken at any point of the series.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

DraftPicked more often in amateur play
Amateur
6.3%
SoloQ
1.7%
6.3% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.7% in soloQ.
DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
11.1%
SoloQ
0.4%
11.1% ban rate in amateur play over 1,329 games, against 0.4% in soloQ over 82,299 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
30.4 min
SoloQ
28.1 min
Median of 30.4 min in amateur play, against 28.1 min in soloQ.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Summon Aery, then Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, and Rabadon's Deathcap: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesSummon Aery49% · 4,017

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Teleport85% · 7,024

Same in amateur play

SkillsQnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 94% · 33 games

Core (3 legendaries)11% · 337

11%of soloQ games

Luden's Echo
Shadowflame
Rabadon's Deathcap

Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Plays teamfights first: more teamfights than 77% of mid laners.

Plays teamfightstop23%58% · mid laners: 55%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

Teamfight

Like other mid laners

Damage in lane
Damage in mid game
Damage in late game
Gold at 15 min
Gold at 20 min
Map pressure
Absorbs damage
Crowd control (CC)
Team damage

What it is not

Few duels
No poke
No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 43 in lane, 44 in mid game and 50 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

521-7 vs 528

880-19 vs 899

1,1790 vs 1,179

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Oriannamid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 63% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners

3.2takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 43 of 100 among mid laners521 · median 528
Damage in mid game · rank 44 of 100 among mid laners880 · median 899
Damage in late game · rank 50 of 100 among mid laners1,179 · median 1,179
Gold at 15 min · rank 39 of 100 among mid laners-53 · median +25
Gold at 20 min · rank 38 of 100 among mid laners-126 · median +71
Map pressure · rank 52 of 100 among mid laners3.2 · median 3.2
Absorbs damage · rank 43 of 100 among mid laners437 · median 489
Plays teamfights · rank 77 of 100 among mid laners58% · median 55%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 16 of 100 among mid laners17% · median 23%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 75 of 100 among mid lanersrank 75 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 68 of 100 among mid laners0.9 · median 0.7
Team damage · rank 69 of 100 among mid laners23% · median 21%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Jarvan IV60.6% · expected 51.3% · 33 g+9.3 ptSoloQ -1.2

Wukong47.2% · expected 46.1% · 36 g+1.1 ptSoloQ -0.3

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

Yunara58.8% · expected 45.1% · 34 g+13.8 ptSoloQ +0.6

Supportgap to expected

Lulu59.4% · expected 49.9% · 32 g+9.5 ptSoloQ +3.2

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Nocturne48.1% · expected 46.8% · 54 g+1.3 ptSoloQ -4.5

Wukong48.1% · expected 47.1% · 52 g+0.9 ptSoloQ -3.8

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

Karma47.1% · expected 40.9% · 34 g+6.2 ptSoloQ -0.5

Lulu44.1% · expected 43.4% · 34 g+0.7 ptSoloQ -0.6

Nautilus51.5% · expected 50.3% · 33 g+1.2 ptSoloQ +1.3

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top20 champions