Tournament presence · pick + ban
20.8%#25 of 173 champions
Pick
10.5%picked in 682 of 6,486 games
Ban
10.3%334 bans over 3,246 games, against 16.9% in soloQ
Win rate as Mid— 8 wins over 25 games
Median length—soloQ 27.2 min

Amateur: 6,491 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 336,200 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

2 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

  • DraftPicked less often in amateur play
    Amateur
    0.2%
    SoloQ
    0.3%
    0.2% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 0.3% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned less often in amateur play
    Amateur
    10.7%
    SoloQ
    16.9%
    10.7% ban rate in amateur play over 1,886 games, against 16.9% in soloQ over 129,307 games.

Not enough games to judge: win rate, length, keystone, spells, and core.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Arcane Comet, then Malignance, Stormsurge, and Shadowflame: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesArcane Comet83% · 1,968
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Teleport56% · 1,323
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 84% · 90 games
Core (3 legendaries)16% · 96
16%of soloQ games
  1. Malignance
  2. Stormsurge
  3. Shadowflame
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Below the floor: no measure published.

Below the floor: no measure published.

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

No positive gap in amateur play.

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

No pair measured in amateur play on this side.

05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Not enough series to settle it: raw counts only.

Pick rate as Mid

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+0.3%2,039 picks of 672,394ban 16.9% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments0.2%19 picks of 9,366ban 10.7% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.0%0 picks of 2,204bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

27.7% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Mid
Once picked, the series moves on to

Not enough series yet: published from 30.

Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.