Champion sheet · Mid

Ekko

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · KR

Tournament presence · pick + ban

6.8%#106 of 173 champions

Pick: 3.5%picked in 639 of 18,051 games
Ban: 3.3%571 bans over 17,105 games, against 0.9% in soloQ

Win rate as Mid55.4% between 50.5% and 60.2% over 278 gamesSoloQ 52.0%: no clear gap

Median length29 minsoloQ 26.1 min

Amateur: 18,068 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 304,693 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.DraftLength
How to play itHail of Blades, then Dusk and Dawn, Shadowflame, and Rabadon's Deathcap: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compMap pressure first: more map pressure than 79% of mid laners.Map pressureSplit-push
With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
In draftPriority pick: taken in G1, burned afterwards.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

DraftPicked less often in amateur play
Amateur
0.8%
SoloQ
1.5%
0.8% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.5% in soloQ.
DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
3.4%
SoloQ
0.9%
3.4% ban rate in amateur play over 10,152 games, against 0.9% in soloQ over 112,312 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
29 min
SoloQ
26.1 min
Median of 29 min in amateur play, against 26.1 min in soloQ.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Hail of Blades, then Dusk and Dawn, Shadowflame, and Rabadon's Deathcap: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesHail of Blades84% · 8,463

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Ignite56% · 5,630

Same in amateur play

SkillsQnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 100% · 42 games

Core (3 legendaries)29% · 1,068

29%of soloQ games

Dusk and Dawn
Shadowflame
Rabadon's Deathcap

Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Map pressure first: more map pressure than 79% of mid laners.

Map pressuretop21%3.8 · mid laners: 3.2

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

Map pressure
Split-push

Like other mid laners

Damage in lane
Damage in mid game
Damage in late game
Gold at 15 min
Gold at 20 min
Absorbs damage
Plays teamfights
Takes its kills in duels
Crowd control (CC)
Team damage

What it is not

Carries its own kills
No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 53 in lane, 54 in mid game and 45 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

533+5 vs 528

918+18 vs 899

1,166-12 vs 1,179

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Ekkomid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 71% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners

3.8takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 53 of 100 among mid laners533 · median 528
Damage in mid game · rank 54 of 100 among mid laners918 · median 899
Damage in late game · rank 45 of 100 among mid laners1,166 · median 1,179
Gold at 15 min · rank 63 of 100 among mid laners+140 · median +25
Gold at 20 min · rank 71 of 100 among mid laners+311 · median +71
Map pressure · rank 79 of 100 among mid laners3.8 · median 3.2
Absorbs damage · rank 68 of 100 among mid laners652 · median 489
Plays teamfights · rank 27 of 100 among mid laners53% · median 55%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 69 of 100 among mid laners25% · median 23%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 12 of 100 among mid lanersrank 12 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 39 of 100 among mid laners0.6 · median 0.7
Team damage · rank 66 of 100 among mid laners23% · median 21%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Lee Sin54.3% · expected 54.1% · 35 g+0.2 ptSoloQ +1.1

ADCgap to expected

Caitlyn67.6% · expected 57.3% · 34 g+10.4 ptSoloQ +0.7

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top18 champions