Tournament presence · pick + ban
32.5%#9 of 173 champions
Pick
16.8%picked in 445 of 2,644 games
Ban
15.7%307 bans over 1,958 games, against 3.6% in soloQ
Win rate as Support— 0 wins over 1 games
Median length—soloQ 28.7 min

Amateur: 2,664 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, NA. SoloQ Master+: 215,636 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

2 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Support.

  • DraftPicked less often in amateur play
    Amateur
    0.0%
    SoloQ
    0.1%
    0.0% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 0.1% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    16.1%
    SoloQ
    3.6%
    16.1% ban rate in amateur play over 1,329 games, against 3.6% in soloQ over 82,299 games.

Not enough games to judge: win rate, length, keystone, spells, and core.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Electrocute, then Malignance, Rylai's Crystal Scepter, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesElectrocute66% · 276
Amateur: Dark Harvest, gap not settled
SpellsFlash + Ignite79% · 328
Same in amateur play
Core (3 legendaries)11% · 6
11%of soloQ games
  1. Malignance
  2. Rylai's Crystal Scepter
  3. Zhonya's Hourglass

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Below the floor: no measure published.

Below the floor: no measure published.

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

No positive gap in amateur play.

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

No pair measured in amateur play on this side.

05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Not enough series to settle it: raw counts only.

Pick rate as Support

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+0.1%346 picks of 431,269ban 3.6% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments0.0%1 picks of 3,686ban 16.1% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.0%0 picks of 2,204bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

27.8% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Support
Once picked, the series moves on to

Not enough series yet: published from 30.

Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.