Tournament presence · pick + ban
47.7%#2 of 173 champions
Pick
23.3%picked in 4,210 of 18,059 games
Ban
24.4%4,180 bans over 17,112 games, against 24.0% in soloQ
Win rate as Mid48.2% between 46.2% and 50.2% over 1,724 gamesSoloQ 47.9%: no clear gap
Median length28.8 minsoloQ 25.8 min

Amateur: 18,068 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 304,693 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

2 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    24.8%
    SoloQ
    24.0%
    24.8% ban rate in amateur play over 10,152 games, against 24.0% in soloQ over 112,312 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    28.8 min
    SoloQ
    25.8 min
    Median of 28.8 min in amateur play, against 25.8 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Conqueror, then Hextech Rocketbelt, Riftmaker, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesConqueror60% · 20,128
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Teleport52% · 17,277
Same in amateur play
SkillsWnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 72% · 111 games
Core (3 legendaries)41% · 3,725
41%of soloQ games
  1. Hextech Rocketbelt
  2. Riftmaker
  3. Zhonya's Hourglass
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Map pressure first: more map pressure than 87% of mid laners.

  1. Map pressuretop14%4.6 · mid laners: 3.2

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

  • Map pressure
  • Split-push

Like other mid laners

  • Damage in mid game
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills
  • Crowd control (CC)
  • Team damage

What it is not

  • No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 91 in lane, 59 in mid game and 42 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

599+71 vs 528
927+28 vs 899
1,155-24 vs 1,179
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Sylasmid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 55% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners
4.6takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 91 of 100 among mid laners599 · median 528
  • Damage in mid game · rank 59 of 100 among mid laners927 · median 899
  • Damage in late game · rank 42 of 100 among mid laners1,155 · median 1,179
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 42 of 100 among mid laners-44 · median +25
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 45 of 100 among mid laners-43 · median +71
  • Map pressure · rank 87 of 100 among mid laners4.6 · median 3.2
  • Absorbs damage · rank 76 of 100 among mid laners815 · median 489
  • Plays teamfights · rank 26 of 100 among mid laners53% · median 55%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 73 of 100 among mid laners26% · median 23%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 35 of 100 among mid lanersrank 35 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 69 of 100 among mid laners0.9 · median 0.7
  • Team damage · rank 68 of 100 among mid laners23% · median 21%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Xin Zhao in amateur play: +12.7 pts over 70 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Ambessa60.8% · expected 48.8% · 79 g+11.9 ptSoloQ -2.7
Gnar60.0% · expected 49.1% · 50 g+10.9 ptSoloQ +1.2
Shen54.0% · expected 48.8% · 50 g+5.2 ptSoloQ -0.5
K'Sante52.0% · expected 50.2% · 98 g+1.8 ptSoloQ 0.0
Gwen50.0% · expected 47.9% · 50 g+2.1 ptSoloQ -1.7
Junglegap to expected
Xin Zhao61.4% · expected 48.7% · 70 g+12.7 ptSoloQ -0.4
Lillia56.6% · expected 46.2% · 53 g+10.4 ptSoloQ -2.4
Nocturne59.3% · expected 50.8% · 54 g+8.4 ptSoloQ +1.6
Viego54.4% · expected 48.7% · 79 g+5.7 ptSoloQ +0.8
Sejuani54.3% · expected 48.7% · 46 g+5.7 ptSoloQ +2.6
Midgap to expected
Lissandra59.6% · expected 49.9% · 109 g+9.8 ptSoloQ +4.1
Ahri49.3% · expected 45.4% · 201 g+3.9 ptSoloQ +0.6
Orianna54.4% · expected 51.7% · 79 g+2.7 ptSoloQ +1.1
Galio50.7% · expected 48.6% · 75 g+2.1 ptSoloQ -1.5
Locke57.1% · expected 50.9% · 35 g+6.2 ptSoloQ -0.7
ADCgap to expected
Kai'Sa53.5% · expected 47.9% · 144 g+5.6 ptSoloQ -0.4
Yunara50.6% · expected 45.7% · 166 g+4.9 ptSoloQ +0.8
Jinx49.0% · expected 44.0% · 102 g+5.1 ptSoloQ -1.3
Aphelios59.0% · expected 53.0% · 78 g+6.0 ptSoloQ -2.5
Ashe48.8% · expected 45.3% · 123 g+3.5 ptSoloQ +1.5
Supportgap to expected
Thresh50.4% · expected 46.5% · 113 g+3.9 ptSoloQ -1.1
Lulu53.2% · expected 50.6% · 154 g+2.6 ptSoloQ 0.0
Leona49.0% · expected 47.5% · 157 g+1.6 ptSoloQ +0.9
Nautilus50.8% · expected 49.8% · 191 g+1.0 ptSoloQ +1.1
Rell48.1% · expected 44.0% · 79 g+4.1 ptSoloQ -1.4

With

Topgap to expected
Jax58.7% · expected 48.6% · 46 g+10.1 ptSoloQ -1.3
Camille56.9% · expected 49.6% · 51 g+7.3 ptSoloQ +2.3
Malphite52.7% · expected 50.0% · 112 g+2.7 ptSoloQ +2.0
Ambessa50.0% · expected 47.6% · 96 g+2.4 ptSoloQ -1.3
K'Sante47.8% · expected 46.2% · 90 g+1.6 ptSoloQ +1.7
Junglegap to expected
Sejuani64.0% · expected 47.7% · 50 g+16.3 ptSoloQ +0.7
Cho'Gath61.7% · expected 50.7% · 47 g+11.0 ptSoloQ +0.2
Nocturne55.2% · expected 45.6% · 58 g+9.6 ptSoloQ +0.9
Viego57.1% · expected 47.7% · 56 g+9.4 ptSoloQ -0.7
Vi51.9% · expected 49.0% · 133 g+2.9 ptSoloQ -1.5
ADCgap to expected
Jinx62.7% · expected 52.5% · 102 g+10.3 ptSoloQ -0.2
Lucian56.5% · expected 47.7% · 92 g+8.8 ptSoloQ -1.4
Tristana55.2% · expected 47.0% · 67 g+8.2 ptSoloQ -1.3
Caitlyn54.2% · expected 50.1% · 153 g+4.2 ptSoloQ +0.6
Kai'Sa49.3% · expected 48.5% · 146 g+0.8 ptSoloQ -1.0
Supportgap to expected
Milio58.8% · expected 47.0% · 80 g+11.7 ptSoloQ -3.3
Lulu49.1% · expected 45.8% · 171 g+3.3 ptSoloQ -0.1
Blitzcrank54.8% · expected 49.5% · 93 g+5.3 ptSoloQ -1.1
Braum54.1% · expected 50.5% · 111 g+3.6 ptSoloQ +0.6
Alistar53.9% · expected 49.6% · 76 g+4.3 ptSoloQ +0.5

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top26 champions
  • K'Sante98 games
    52.0%gap +1.8 ptsSoloQ: 49.4% · 1,463 g
  • Ambessa79 games
    60.8%gap +11.9 ptsSoloQ: 45.9% · 994 g
  • Sion76 games
    43.4%gap -5.1 ptsSoloQ: 49.1% · 477 g
  • Nasus73 games
    45.2%gap -1.5 ptsSoloQ: 48.0% · 667 g
  • Renekton66 games
    47.0%gap -0.6 ptsSoloQ: 53.7% · 940 g
Jungle21 champions
  • Lee Sin210 games
    45.2%gap -4.3 ptsSoloQ: 47.2% · 4,063 g
  • Vi164 games
    45.1%gap -2.3 ptsSoloQ: 50.4% · 1,328 g
  • Wukong130 games
    38.5%gap -5.9 ptsSoloQ: 44.1% · 794 g
  • Jarvan IV116 games
    43.1%gap -6.6 ptsSoloQ: 50.9% · 1,323 g
  • Viego79 games
    54.4%gap +5.7 ptsSoloQ: 50.6% · 1,229 g
Mid20 champions
  • Ahri201 games
    49.3%gap +3.9 ptsSoloQ: 47.8% · 1,837 g
  • Lissandra109 games
    59.6%gap +9.8 ptsSoloQ: 50.3% · 1,144 g
  • Syndra98 games
    49.0%gap +0.5 ptsSoloQ: 52.2% · 1,203 g
  • Viktor97 games
    48.5%gap +0.3 ptsSoloQ: 51.6% · 1,815 g
  • Orianna79 games
    54.4%gap +2.7 ptsSoloQ: 50.2% · 910 g
ADC17 champions
  • Yunara166 games
    50.6%gap +4.9 ptsSoloQ: 48.2% · 2,912 g
  • Kai'Sa144 games
    53.5%gap +5.6 ptsSoloQ: 47.4% · 3,986 g
  • Ezreal140 games
    51.4%gap -1.2 ptsSoloQ: 53.0% · 2,091 g
  • Caitlyn135 games
    43.0%gap -3.4 ptsSoloQ: 50.5% · 1,746 g
  • Jhin126 games
    55.6%gap +3.2 ptsSoloQ: 48.6% · 3,699 g
Support17 champions
  • Nautilus191 games
    50.8%gap +1.0 ptsSoloQ: 49.5% · 2,721 g
  • Leona157 games
    49.0%gap +1.6 ptsSoloQ: 47.0% · 1,463 g
  • Lulu154 games
    53.2%gap +2.6 ptsSoloQ: 47.8% · 2,633 g
  • Seraphine142 games
    43.7%gap -2.3 ptsSoloQ: 50.4% · 841 g
  • Thresh113 games
    50.4%gap +3.9 ptsSoloQ: 44.1% · 2,458 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Priority pick: taken in G1, burned afterwards.

Pick rate as Mid

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+4.8%29,394 picks of 609,385ban 24.0% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments4.8%1,030 picks of 21,472ban 24.8% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro3.2%71 picks of 2,204bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

45.4% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Mid
  • 10.0%G1410 games of 4,081
  • 8.8%G2358 games of 4,082
  • 6.4%G3+112 games of 1,756
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 410 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.