Tournament presence · pick + ban
9.0%#88 of 173 champions
Pick
5.0%picked in 131 of 2,644 games
Ban
4.0%79 bans over 1,958 games, against 1.6% in soloQ
Win rate as Support51.0% between 39.7% and 62.2% over 51 gamesSoloQ 48.5%: no clear gap
Median length30.4 minsoloQ 29.1 min

Amateur: 2,664 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, NA. SoloQ Master+: 215,636 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

2 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Support.

  • DraftPicked less often in amateur play
    Amateur
    1.0%
    SoloQ
    2.0%
    1.0% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 2.0% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    4.2%
    SoloQ
    1.6%
    4.2% ban rate in amateur play over 1,329 games, against 1.6% in soloQ over 82,299 games.

Not enough games to judge: core.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Arcane Comet, then Luden's Echo, Stormsurge, and Shadowflame: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesArcane Comet77% · 7,805
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Heal55% · 5,556
Same in amateur play
SkillsEnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 100% · 56 games
Core (3 legendaries)15% · 228
15%of soloQ games
  1. Luden's Echo
  2. Stormsurge
  3. Shadowflame
Amateur: Luden's Echo, Zhonya's Hourglass, Rabadon's Deathcap, gap not settled

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 90% of supports.

  1. Crowd control (CC)top10%1.5 · supports: 1
  2. Team damagetop15%15% · supports: 9%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other supports

What marks it

  • CC
  • Damage
  • Poke

Like other supports

  • Map pressure
  • Absorbs damage
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills

What it is not

  • Few teamfights

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 80 in lane, 89 in mid game and 87 in late game, out of 100 supports.

387+99 vs 288
574+233 vs 342
657+269 vs 388
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Luxsupports

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 78% of supports against the direct opponent.

supports
5.2takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; supports: 4.5.

Where it stands among supports · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 80 of 100 among supports387 · median 288
  • Damage in mid game · rank 89 of 100 among supports574 · median 342
  • Damage in late game · rank 87 of 100 among supports657 · median 388
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 78 of 100 among supports+276 · median +105
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 78 of 100 among supports+410 · median +193
  • Map pressure · rank 53 of 100 among supports5.2 · median 4.5
  • Absorbs damage · rank 36 of 100 among supports303 · median 393
  • Plays teamfights · rank 22 of 100 among supports50% · median 54%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 75 of 100 among supports21% · median 17%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 26 of 100 among supportsrank 26 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 90 of 100 among supports1.5 · median 1
  • Team damage · rank 85 of 100 among supports15% · median 9%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top1 champion
  • Ornn6 games
    —SoloQ: 47.2% · 231 g
Mid1 champion
  • Ahri9 games
    —SoloQ: 49.5% · 455 g
ADC2 champions
  • Yunara8 games
    —SoloQ: 51.1% · 747 g
  • Ezreal5 games
    —SoloQ: 49.6% · 480 g
Support1 champion
  • Lulu9 games
    —SoloQ: 47.2% · 615 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Not enough series to settle it: raw counts only.

Pick rate as Support

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+2.0%8,433 picks of 431,269ban 1.6% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments1.0%36 picks of 3,686ban 4.2% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.5%10 picks of 2,204bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

7.9% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Support
Once picked, the series moves on to

Not enough series yet: published from 30.

Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.